There's just that irritating sense of pointlessness behind the game when umpiring mistakes are as likely to decide the game as the skill of any of the players.
I teach technology design (particularly, software engineering, human-computer interaction, Scala, mobile, and web development) at the University of New England. I do research in how we can design smart useful systems and make sure that reasoning machines aren't unreasonable machines. Especially in technology education and education technology. I also re-invent far too many of my own wheels.
Thursday, 20 August 2009
The problem with cricket
The Ashes have been on, and, while I don't often watch cricket, I couldn't pass up the chance to watch at least some of the series, given I'm a citizen of both countries involved. It's been tight and entertaining, but I can't help feel that too much of it comes down to the luck of the umpiring decision. In the match England won, at Lords, three Australian batsmen were incorrectly given out in their last innings when replays showed they shouldn't have been. And in this deciding match at The Oval, two of England's top order (Strauss and Bell) have been given out off what should have been no-balls. In a game where there can be fifty or a hundred runs between wicket-taking balls, that potentially makes a match-changing difference.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Thats pretty much how Bear Stearns feels
Post a Comment